Wednesday, October 5, 2011

How Our Government Could Lower the Price of Gas by Half in a Matter of Weeks.

Lower the price of gasoline by half in a matter of weeks? Most would say, “It can’t be done!” “Doesn’t it cost more than that to produce gas?” “Isn’t gas in short supply?”

Well, I’m here to tell you it can be done, and should be done. Here is how and why.

First, to understand the how and why, it will help to understand some simple concepts. You see, the price of gas is NOT set by oil companies marking up production costs. It is set in the open market by speculators in oil futures’ contracts. Don’t let your eyes glaze over now. This is important stuff. “A futures’ contract” might seem like mumbo jumbo beyond our ability to comprehend, but it’s really quite simple.

A futures’ contract  is simply a promise to buy X barrels of oil at a future time for a specific price. Oil companies insure profitable future production by pre-selling oil using such contracts to speculators. The speculators make money by reselling those contracts for even more than the oil companies originally charged to other speculators (or oil distributors), when the consensus is that oil prices will rise. If everyone believes worldwide demand will eventually outstrip supply, those contracts become worth more and more and more. That is what has happened over the course of the last two years. But look at the chart of Crude oil futures prices to the left. What do you suppose caused the price to plummet the way it did in late 2009? Then why did the price steadily rise thereafter?

For the past two years, nearly everyone HAS BELIEVED that worldwide demand will eventually outstrip supply. That is why the price of gas we pay at the pump has DOUBLED. It is NOT because oil production costs have doubled, or because there is a shortage of oil TODAY. The fact is it doesn’t cost much more to produce gas today than it did two years ago, and there is enough oil in already-developed fields to supply the world’s needs for more than a decade. In addition, huge known reserves of untapped oil and natural gas exist, and oil companies make fresh discoveries regularly.

The elephant in the room, the obvious question, is, “Why does everyone BELIEVE that worldwide demand will outstrip supply?” That question is at the heart of the matter, because if that BELIEF were to change, the price of oil, and gas at the pump would plummet, almost OVERNIGHT. Affecting that BELIEF is also where our government’s policies have the most impact.  

America consumes approximately 150 billion gallons of gasoline per year, far more than any other nation on the planet. During the last American presidential election, there was a lot of talk about America becoming “energy independent.” Rallies were chanting, "Drill, Baby, Drill!" There was real fear among speculators that the US would change its policy and and push for energy independence. Talk is cheap, but that talk, alone, caused the price of gas to plummet. Then, after the election, the imperative for “energy independence” dissolved like so much other campaign rhetoric.  

Does America even have the oil and gas to achieve energy independence? Absolutely! In fact America has proven oil and gas reserves sufficient to provide all its forecast energy needs for the next century. “So, how can anyone believe that worldwide demand will outstrip supply?” you might ask. It is America’s energy policy, (or lack thereof), that creates that impression. America shoots itself in the foot by not having a cohesive energy policy, and not actively pursuing “energy independence.” In fact, our current governmental policy stands in the way of extracting many known reserves right here in America.

If our government made “energy independence” a national priority, and showed real resolve by taking concrete first steps by removing roadblocks to extraction of reserves right here in America, the BELIEF that worldwide demand will outstrip supply would be crushed, and prices of oil futures would plummet immediately. It would only take a matter of weeks (just as it did in late 2009) for prices at filling stations to reflect the new paradigm (see graph of how quickly they fell leading up to the last election). My educated guess is they could go down by half.

A side benefit, so precious in today’s economy, would be a boom in oil and gas related employment. Please remember what you have read here and encourage your representatives in government, whether Democratic, Republican or Independent to make energy independence for America a high priority. Acting today will have an immediate beneficial effect on the cost of all goods and services shipped, and could save over $1000 per year at the pump for the average American family.

Finally, I want you to know I consider myself a conservationist. I lived in the bush for a year in South Africa, existing on solar power. I believe in the future of alternative energy, especially solar. However, I also believe that America must pursue energy independence in today’s oil economy, while continuing to pursue alternative energy sources. I also believe this is possible with minimal impact to the environment.
Cheers, Pete Grimm.

7 comments:

Dannie said...

Great Article, Pete! If only the politicians would listen and not be influenced by the big sorp out there who only want the money- no matter the hardship.

Good advise too.

Mr Bob said...

Well Said, but so far even the "evil" Republicans have only paid the "drill baby drill" mantra lip service. Time to use the resources the good Lord put in the ground right here.

Larry Brumm said...

I believe that the high cost of energy is the major cause for our poor economy, maybe the only cause for the poor economy, we really need to do all that is possible to restore our cheap energy base.

Giancarlo said...

Deregulation of the oil industry has not totally been able to avert or stop the perfect oligopoly that exists in the market and when you throw in futures contracts pegged at such exhorbitant prices, then that's when perfect oligopoly pit powers with a few monopolizing it. And because majority of industries in the world, at the moment, use oil voraciously to run its day to day operations, speed up productions, support industrialization so on and so forth, it seems like they're at knife's edge that once the regular flow of oil, gas & other resources related will cause massive destructions, loss of calculated incomes, derail industrialization and competitiveness.
The oil sector is such a complex area of investments and is so well controlled by countries who have large resources of it and have the capability to control production at will or to overproduce when necessary. But it's monopoly -or a group or organization of few - that makes it more daunting to predict what's forthcoming prices going down or going up. Of course, the changes in prices in normal economics flow would dictate the prices due to supply and demand circumstances. But when you rig the prices or design something that would alter the normal course of supply, demand and prices, then that's when complexities begin. If you cause to limit the production of bread although dough is in abundance and there is high demand for bread, then the prices tend to move upwards. It's causing artificial shortage. Just like when a few individuals or firms speculate oil prices. It causes uneasiness in the market and the tendency is to secure an order now when it's cheaper, rather than be strained with unimaginable prices at some point in the future. The natural flow of the market is rigged to maximize profit. And that doesn't bode well for economies already experiencing hardships, the road to recovery will be tougher and a nation loses its competitiveness with other countries. The sudden stiff shift in prices will have adverse effects on the value of the currency (exchange rates), import-export (international trade), foreign debts, etc etc.

It's not only a mere change in the prices of oil, but every aspect in the economy that depends on it. It begs the question, when is it more possible to run our industries, cars, homes with water, or when is it going to be more efficient or much cheaper, or widely available to use water as an alternative source of energy.

BostonMaggie said...

The problem is just what you caution against in the post - peple's eyes glaze over. I have tried to explain this to people, but they really have to want to hear it.

More than a problem with the economy, it's a national security issue. Unfortunately, most people can't see it.

JAdams said...

I love your Blog, Pete! However, I must take exception to this one. In Houston tankers are leaving the port with gasoline because the world market price is as good or better than what the refineries can get in the US market. I am for free trade, but this is one time it is biting me. I don't think it will be the last. Specuators play a part in the US, but the market is also playing a big part. You also forgot to mention the amount of taxes on gasoline. i know they post te federal and state tax in some places, bt that does not include the refinery gate tax, the pipeline tax, the tanker tax. you would be shocked at the price of gas as it leaves the refinery (And, no I am not going to slit my financial throat by mentioning it)

Anonymous said...

Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally,
it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
You clearly know what youre talking about, why
throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us
something enlightening to read?

Take a look at my homepage ... Bench Craft Company advertising slogans for spring